2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR vs. 1988 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Ford Tempo weights approximately 105 kg more than 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Because 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1988 Ford Tempo has automatic transmission and 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR has manual transmission. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1988 Ford Tempo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | 1988 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Ford |
Model | CLK GTR | Tempo |
Year Released | 2002 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4998 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2540 mm |