2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 1002 kg more than 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Because 2013 Jaguar XF is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Jaguar |
| Model | CLK GTR | XF |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4998 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 335 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 2002 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 2053 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2909 mm |
