2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1960 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK (167 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1960 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1960 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 815 kg more than 1960 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK (240 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1960 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Triumph |
| Model | CLK | Herald |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1960 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 167 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 29 L |
