2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1965 Renault Dauphine
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault Dauphine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault Dauphine would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK (167 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1965 Renault Dauphine. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault Dauphine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 943 kg more than 1965 Renault Dauphine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK (240 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Renault Dauphine. (57 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Renault Dauphine.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1965 Renault Dauphine | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Renault |
Model | CLK | Dauphine |
Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 843 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 167 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 57 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 58 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.2 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 632 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 38 L |