2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1969 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,596 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK (161 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1969 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1969 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 355 kg more than 1969 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1969 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | CLK | Cedric |
Year Released | 2002 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2596 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2700 mm |