2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 2,596 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 795 kg more than 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Because 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
Model | CLK | Pajero |
Year Released | 2002 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2596 cc | 700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1400 mm |