2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK (168 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1999 Nissan C 52. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan C 52. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 274 kg more than 1999 Nissan C 52. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (240 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | CLK | C 52 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 354 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1266 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2830 mm |