2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2001 MG X20
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 MG X20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 MG X20 would be higher. At 2,683 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 MG X20 (177 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (170 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 MG X20 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Because 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 MG X20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2001 MG X20 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | MG |
| Model | CLK | X20 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2683 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 177 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
