2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 2,596 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 935 kg more than 2001 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2001 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2001 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
| Model | CLK | Minica |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2596 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2350 mm |
