2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 2,596 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 79 more horse power than 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (161 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK (400 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Holden |
Model | CLK | Commodore |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2596 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |