2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2009 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK (168 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Cube. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Because 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK (240 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Cube. (127 Nm). This means 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2009 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | CLK | Cube |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 127 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 82 L |