2002 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,193 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz E (120 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 345 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercedes-Benz E (270 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2002 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mercedes-Benz E | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
| Model | E | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2193 cc | 2164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 270 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2700 mm |
