2002 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1980 Volvo 265

To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 2,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 265 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2002 Mercedes-Benz E. (120 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 265 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mercedes-Benz E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 180 kg more than 1980 Volvo 265.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercedes-Benz E (270 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 265. (230 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 265.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Mercedes-Benz E 1980 Volvo 265
Make Mercedes-Benz Volvo
Model E 265
Year Released 2002 1980
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2147 cc 2849 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 120 HP 153 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 270 Nm 230 Nm
Torque RPM 1400 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 88 mm 91.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.3 mm 73 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1600 kg 1420 kg
Vehicle Length 4820 mm 4890 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2660 mm