2002 Mercedes-Benz G vs. 1953 Riley RM A
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz G is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz G is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Riley RM A weights approximately 140 kg more than 2002 Mercedes-Benz G.
Because 2002 Mercedes-Benz G is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz G will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mercedes-Benz G has automatic transmission and 1953 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1953 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mercedes-Benz G will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mercedes-Benz G | 1953 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Riley |
| Model | G | RM A |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2870 mm |
