2002 Mercedes-Benz S vs. 1963 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz S (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 1963 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz S should accelerate faster than 1963 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz S weights approximately 1040 kg more than 1963 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercedes-Benz S (460 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 379 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2002 Mercedes-Benz S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mercedes-Benz S | 1963 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Wartburg |
Model | S | 312 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4966 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 460 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 6.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 43 L |