2002 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 5,441 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL (494 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 375 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (119 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 695 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL (700 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 485 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mercedes-Benz SL | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
Model | SL | Celica |
Year Released | 2002 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5441 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 494 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 700 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2650 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2640 mm |