2002 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz C

To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 5,441 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL (494 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 358 more horse power than 2011 Mercedes-Benz C. (136 HP @ 2800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 2011 Mercedes-Benz C.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL (700 Nm @ 2650 RPM) has 340 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mercedes-Benz C. (360 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mercedes-Benz C.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Mercedes-Benz SL 2011 Mercedes-Benz C
Make Mercedes-Benz Mercedes-Benz
Model SL C
Year Released 2002 2011
Body Type Convertible Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5441 cc 2143 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 494 HP 136 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 2800 RPM
Torque 700 Nm 360 Nm
Torque RPM 2650 RPM 1600 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 16.2:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 7-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4540 mm 4606 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1300 mm 1459 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2760 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 62 L 66 L