2002 Mercedes-Benz V vs. 2013 Volvo C30

To start off, 2013 Volvo C30 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mercedes-Benz V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mercedes-Benz V would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2013 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo C30 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2002 Mercedes-Benz V. (139 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mercedes-Benz V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz V weights approximately 543 kg more than 2013 Volvo C30.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo C30 (320 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mercedes-Benz V. (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mercedes-Benz V.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Mercedes-Benz V 2013 Volvo C30
Make Mercedes-Benz Volvo
Model V C30
Year Released 2002 2013
Body Type Minivan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2295 cc 2500 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 5 valves
Horse Power 139 HP 224 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 320 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 5000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 2000 kg 1457 kg
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 4266 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 2039 mm
Vehicle Height 1850 mm 1447 mm
Wheelbase Size 3010 mm 2640 mm