2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision vs. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,798 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision (355 HP) has 230 more horse power than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (125 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision should accelerate faster than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 45 kg more than 2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision (530 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (306 Nm). This means 2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision | 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Oldsmobile |
Model | Vision | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2002 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5439 cc | 5798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 355 HP | 125 HP |
Torque | 530 Nm | 306 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 103.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 85.9 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 5030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 2760 mm |