2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision vs. 1977 Volvo 164
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision (355 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1977 Volvo 164. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision should accelerate faster than 1977 Volvo 164.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision (530 Nm) has 326 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Volvo 164. (204 Nm). This means 2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mercedes-Benz Vision | 1977 Volvo 164 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
| Model | Vision | 164 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5439 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 355 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 530 Nm | 204 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 5610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3230 mm | 3350 mm |
