2002 Mercury Cougar vs. 1961 BMW Isetta
To start off, 2002 Mercury Cougar is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercury Cougar (123 HP) has 110 more horse power than 1961 BMW Isetta. (13 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1961 BMW Isetta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 950 kg more than 1961 BMW Isetta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 BMW Isetta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 BMW Isetta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mercury Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mercury Cougar | 1961 BMW Isetta | |
Make | Mercury | BMW |
Model | Cougar | Isetta |
Year Released | 2002 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 1 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | single |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 13 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 1 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 2300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 1510 mm |