2002 Mercury Cougar vs. 1973 Monteverdi 2000
To start off, 2002 Mercury Cougar is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Monteverdi 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Monteverdi 2000 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Monteverdi 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Monteverdi 2000 (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2002 Mercury Cougar. (123 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Monteverdi 2000 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 20 kg more than 1973 Monteverdi 2000.
Because 1973 Monteverdi 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Monteverdi 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mercury Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mercury Cougar | 1973 Monteverdi 2000 | |
| Make | Mercury | Monteverdi |
| Model | Cougar | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1982 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2560 mm |
