2002 Mercury Sable vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 2002 Mercury Sable is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercury Sable weights approximately 565 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mercury Sable has automatic transmission and 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste has manual transmission. 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mercury Sable will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mercury Sable | 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Mercury | Mitsubishi |
Model | Sable | Celeste |
Year Released | 2002 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2350 mm |