2002 Mercury Villager vs. 1956 Volvo Duett
To start off, 2002 Mercury Villager is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Volvo Duett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Volvo Duett would be higher. At 3,274 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercury Villager weights approximately 695 kg more than 1956 Volvo Duett.
Because 1956 Volvo Duett is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Volvo Duett. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mercury Villager has automatic transmission and 1956 Volvo Duett has manual transmission. 1956 Volvo Duett will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mercury Villager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mercury Villager | 1956 Volvo Duett | |
Make | Mercury | Volvo |
Model | Villager | Duett |
Year Released | 2002 | 1956 |
Engine Size | 3274 cc | 1412 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 1090 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2610 mm |