2002 Mercury Villager vs. 2010 Peugeot 5008
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 5008 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 3,274 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercury Villager (168 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2010 Peugeot 5008. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 2010 Peugeot 5008.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercury Villager (271 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Peugeot 5008. (240 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2002 Mercury Villager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Peugeot 5008.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mercury Villager | 2010 Peugeot 5008 | |
Make | Mercury | Peugeot |
Model | Villager | 5008 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3274 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1835 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2735 mm |