2002 Mercury Villager vs. 2011 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2011 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 3,274 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercury Villager (168 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2011 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 2011 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercury Villager (271 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Mercury Villager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mercury Villager | 2011 Proton Gen-2 | |
Make | Mercury | Proton |
Model | Villager | Gen-2 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 3274 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2610 mm |