2002 MG TF vs. 1950 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2002 MG TF is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Talbot T 26 (276 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 2002 MG TF. (114 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 2002 MG TF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MG TF weights approximately 185 kg more than 1950 Talbot T 26.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MG TF | 1950 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | MG | Talbot |
| Model | TF | T 26 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1950 |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 4482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2510 mm |
