2002 MG TF vs. 1956 Rover P4
To start off, 2002 MG TF is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Rover P4 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MG TF (114 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1956 Rover P4. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1956 Rover P4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Rover P4 weights approximately 280 kg more than 2002 MG TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 MG TF (145 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Rover P4. (138 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 MG TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MG TF | 1956 Rover P4 | |
Make | MG | Rover |
Model | TF | P4 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2830 mm |