2002 MG TF vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2002 MG TF is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 MG TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MG TF (114 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MG TF weights approximately 320 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 MG TF (145 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2002 MG TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MG TF | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | MG | Triumph |
| Model | TF | Herald |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 69.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 29 L |
