2002 MG TF vs. 1970 MG MGB
To start off, 2002 MG TF is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 MG MGB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 MG MGB would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 MG MGB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MG TF (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1970 MG MGB. (98 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1970 MG MGB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MG TF weights approximately 240 kg more than 1970 MG MGB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 MG TF (165 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 MG MGB. (149 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 MG TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 MG MGB.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MG TF | 1970 MG MGB | |
Make | MG | MG |
Model | TF | MGB |
Year Released | 2002 | 1970 |
Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 98 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 880 kg |