2002 MG TF vs. 1971 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2002 MG TF is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 MG TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MG TF (114 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1971 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1971 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MG TF weights approximately 120 kg more than 1971 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 MG TF (145 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 MG TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MG TF | 1971 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | MG | Zastava |
Model | TF | 1300 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1971 |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2430 mm |