2002 MG TF vs. 2001 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2002 MG TF is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Celica (190 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2002 MG TF. (114 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2002 MG TF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Celica weights approximately 19 kg more than 2002 MG TF. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 MG TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MG TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Celica (180 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MG TF. (145 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 MG TF | 2001 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | MG | Toyota |
| Model | TF | Celica |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 85.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 11.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1119 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 45 L |
