2002 MG TF vs. 2010 BMW 330
To start off, 2010 BMW 330 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MG TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 BMW 330 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 330 (256 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 2002 MG TF. (114 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 330 should accelerate faster than 2002 MG TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW 330 (540 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 395 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MG TF. (145 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2010 BMW 330 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MG TF | 2010 BMW 330 | |
Make | MG | BMW |
Model | TF | 330 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 540 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4624 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1384 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 57 L |