2002 MG TF vs. 2011 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2011 Ford Ranger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MG TF would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2002 MG TF. (114 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2002 MG TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Ranger (322 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MG TF. (145 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2011 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MG TF | 2011 Ford Ranger | |
Make | MG | Ford |
Model | TF | Ranger |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 322 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3193 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 74 L |