2002 Mini Cooper vs. 1965 BMW 3200 CS
To start off, 2002 Mini Cooper is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 BMW 3200 CS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 BMW 3200 CS would be higher. At 3,169 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 BMW 3200 CS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mini Cooper (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1965 BMW 3200 CS. (160 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mini Cooper should accelerate faster than 1965 BMW 3200 CS.
Because 1965 BMW 3200 CS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 BMW 3200 CS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 BMW 3200 CS (240 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mini Cooper. (210 Nm). This means 1965 BMW 3200 CS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mini Cooper | 1965 BMW 3200 CS | |
Make | Mini | BMW |
Model | Cooper | 3200 CS |
Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3169 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 240 Nm |
Top Speed | 218 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2840 mm |