2002 Mini Cooper vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2002 Mini Cooper is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mini Cooper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mini Cooper (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mini Cooper should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mini Cooper (210 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm). This means 2002 Mini Cooper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mini Cooper | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Mini | Riley |
| Model | Cooper | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2380 mm |
