2002 Mini Cooper vs. 1975 Triumph Stag
To start off, 2002 Mini Cooper is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Triumph Stag. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Triumph Stag would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mini Cooper (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1975 Triumph Stag. (143 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mini Cooper should accelerate faster than 1975 Triumph Stag.
Because 1975 Triumph Stag is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Triumph Stag. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Triumph Stag (234 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mini Cooper. (210 Nm). This means 1975 Triumph Stag will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mini Cooper | 1975 Triumph Stag | |
| Make | Mini | Triumph |
| Model | Cooper | Stag |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1975 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 234 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2550 mm |
