2002 Mini Cooper vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Omega
To start off, 2002 Mini Cooper is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Omega would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mini Cooper (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1982 Oldsmobile Omega. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mini Cooper should accelerate faster than 1982 Oldsmobile Omega.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mini Cooper (210 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Oldsmobile Omega. (183 Nm). This means 2002 Mini Cooper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Oldsmobile Omega. 1982 Oldsmobile Omega has automatic transmission and 2002 Mini Cooper has manual transmission. 2002 Mini Cooper will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Oldsmobile Omega will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mini Cooper | 1982 Oldsmobile Omega | |
Make | Mini | Oldsmobile |
Model | Cooper | Omega |
Year Released | 2002 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 183 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2670 mm |