2002 Mini Cooper vs. 1983 Reliant SE6
To start off, 2002 Mini Cooper is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Reliant SE6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Reliant SE6 would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Reliant SE6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mini Cooper (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1983 Reliant SE6. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mini Cooper should accelerate faster than 1983 Reliant SE6.
Because 1983 Reliant SE6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Reliant SE6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Reliant SE6 (233 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mini Cooper. (210 Nm). This means 1983 Reliant SE6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mini Cooper | 1983 Reliant SE6 | |
| Make | Mini | Reliant |
| Model | Cooper | SE6 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 133 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2650 mm |
