2002 Mini Cooper vs. 1983 Volvo 240
To start off, 2002 Mini Cooper is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,316 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mini Cooper (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1983 Volvo 240. (112 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mini Cooper should accelerate faster than 1983 Volvo 240.
Because 1983 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mini Cooper (210 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volvo 240. (185 Nm). This means 2002 Mini Cooper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mini Cooper | 1983 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | Mini | Volvo |
| Model | Cooper | 240 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2316 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2660 mm |
