2002 Mini Cooper vs. 2000 Opel Omega
To start off, 2002 Mini Cooper is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Opel Omega would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mini Cooper (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2000 Opel Omega. (135 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mini Cooper should accelerate faster than 2000 Opel Omega.
Because 2000 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mini Cooper (210 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Opel Omega. (185 Nm). This means 2002 Mini Cooper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mini Cooper | 2000 Opel Omega | |
Make | Mini | Opel |
Model | Cooper | Omega |
Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 185 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2740 mm |