2002 Mini Cooper vs. 2010 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC90 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mini Cooper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mini Cooper would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC90 (200 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2002 Mini Cooper. (163 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mini Cooper.
Because 2010 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mini Cooper. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo XC90 (420 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mini Cooper. (210 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mini Cooper | 2010 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Mini | Volvo |
Model | Cooper | XC90 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 420 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2860 mm |