2002 Mini Cooper vs. 2013 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-Z is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mini Cooper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mini Cooper would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mini Cooper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda CR-Z (120 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2002 Mini Cooper. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 2002 Mini Cooper.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Honda CR-Z (174 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mini Cooper. (149 Nm). This means 2013 Honda CR-Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mini Cooper | 2013 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Mini | Honda |
Model | Cooper | CR-Z |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 174 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3640 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2435 mm |