2002 Mini Cooper vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mini Cooper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mini Cooper would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (345 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 2002 Mini Cooper. (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2002 Mini Cooper.
Because 2013 Lotus Evora is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Lotus Evora. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lotus Evora (400 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mini Cooper. (210 Nm). This means 2013 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mini Cooper | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Mini | Lotus |
| Model | Cooper | Evora |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4361 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1229 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2575 mm |
