2002 Mini Cooper vs. 2013 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mini Cooper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mini Cooper would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC90 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 2002 Mini Cooper. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mini Cooper.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mini Cooper. (149 Nm). This means 2013 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mini Cooper | 2013 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Mini | Volvo |
| Model | Cooper | XC90 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 6 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 237 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 149 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3640 mm | 4807 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1936 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1784 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2857 mm |
