2002 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1995 Renault Spider
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Renault Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Renault Spider would be higher. At 2,351 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1995 Renault Spider is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Renault Spider. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mitsubishi Colt | 1995 Renault Spider | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Colt | Spider |
Year Released | 2002 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2351 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |