2002 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1996 Plymouth Voyager
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Plymouth Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Plymouth Voyager would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Plymouth Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Plymouth Voyager has automatic transmission and 2002 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 2002 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Plymouth Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mitsubishi Colt | 1996 Plymouth Voyager | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Plymouth |
Model | Colt | Voyager |
Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2351 cc | 3778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 164 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |