2002 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2005 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2005 Subaru Forester is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,351 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mitsubishi Colt | 2005 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Subaru |
Model | Colt | Forester |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2351 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |