2002 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2008 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2008 Nissan Rogue is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,486 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Nissan Rogue is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Rogue will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Mitsubishi Colt | 2008 Nissan Rogue | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Model | Colt | Rogue |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2351 cc | 2486 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
