2002 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2011 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2011 Subaru Outback is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2011 Subaru Outback is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Subaru Outback has automatic transmission and 2002 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 2002 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Subaru Outback will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mitsubishi Colt | 2011 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Subaru |
Model | Colt | Outback |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2351 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 256 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |